Another perspective? Probably not... Yours truly has come to suspect that just about anything critical of a technology that will improve conditions for almost all people, is probably an info op. Is this an info op? There's no proof of that here, just a long series of such "reasons" to not push forward with research about new ideas. Examples in the energy field, besides this one include COLD FUSION, ANEUTRONIC FUSION and the like.
Mind you, it is not a conviction that these new ideas will work. It is the insistence upon maintaining the status quo that I suspect. The status quo means nothing new can be allowed. Know what I mean, Vern?
And it isn't made by the Thorium guys. Perhaps a different perspective will yield a different answer to the question posed.
His answer was something on the order of "maybe".
Some of what he said seems questionable to me, but maybe I am a little biased in favor of Thorium.
Finally, you don't need Thorium in order to run a molten-salt reactor. The molten-salt reactor technology would work with uranium. Thorium is an added bonus. If you disagree with using thorium, you can still use uranium and it will work fine. As a matter of fact, there are some folks out there who would like to do that very thing.
One of the more aggressive outfits who is pursuing this strategy is Thorcon. ( Perhaps I got that wrong. Look at their name. THORcon? ) Thorcon wants to start making reactors within the five years of so. Maybe even sooner.
Be on the lookout then, for Thorcon.