I was just thinking about
this again this morning. What would it take to end the controversy? A friendly bet? Something that would satisfy even the most hard core skeptic? How could you arrange this?
There's somebody I won't name who might be interested in seeing, but not necessarily betting, on a possibility of just testing this thing under certain conditions. One that might satisfy him would be to collect the water that goes through the E-cat, and then measure the heat in it and its mass. This would take place after shutdown.
I checked the amount going through the E-cat on the Oct 6 test. The rate was .91 g per sec. That figures out to 3276 g or 3.276 liters per hour. Multiply that by 8 hours for a test and you get 26.208 liters for an entire test. The idea is to insulate it so that it would keep its heat throughout. Such a container would not be terribly big. It could be insulated and a small pump installed that could keep the water mixed.
One problem is that the water is actually steam, so it has to be cooled down a little before going into the container. To do that, just repeat that part of the test that was done on Oct 6th. Run it through some heat exchangers until it got below the boiling point, then let it go into the container. Then you can measure the heat from that process, plus the remaining heat in the container in order to measure all of the heat generated during the test.
A second problem is from the secondary water source. I'm thinking of making this a small scale demo so that we won't have to use much hardware. That means cooling this water down too so that it doesn't get too hot.
In order to do this, just set up a radiator, such as one that you may see in a car. This can cool down the water so that you can recirculate it over and over again. We are measuring the delta t at the heat exchanger, so it doesn't have to be any one set temperature. Just as long as the difference is such that it can cool down the steam coming off the E-cat.
In the Oct. 6th test, the rate of flow on the secondary heat exchange was 640 liters per hour. That would require a pretty large container. In order to avoid that, the radiator can be called upon to cool the water back down. Perhaps a fan that blows through the radiator would be helpful as well. Perhaps at this point, you could limit the amount of water at the secondary to about 80 liters, or about the size of a 20 gal barrel.
At 640 liters per hour, it would circulate the complete contents of the barrel 8 times every hour. This means that it has about 8 minutes to cool down after going through the radiator. This may be enough to keep it cool. The return could come in at the top and be drawn from the bottom. It would first go through the radiator and then empty back into the barrel. You would need a pump that could pump at that rate for that long. Probably no big deal.
In terms of equipment, you now have 3 20 gal barrels, two of them filled with water. One of these is to go through the E-cat, and one would go through the heat exchanger. The third is to collect the water and measure its temperature at the end of the test. It could be already half full, since you are not going to use all of that one barrel. This third barrel will be fully insulated and have a pump to recirculate the water so that it always well mixed.
The location of the test should be remote in order to eliminate the possibility of any hidden energy source.
To test remotely, you need to be far away from the grid. That means a portable generator which can power up the E-cat device until it reaches self sustain mode. The generator will need to run the pumps and so forth. Such a generator wouldn't be all that big. It just needs to be big enough to do this task, which isn't all that demanding.
All of this equipment could fit into a van, I would estimate. The generator, the 3 barrels, the pumps, the control equipment and the E-cat unit itself. None of these items are all that big. It shouldn't be too demanding a task to get it all into a van.
Take the van out into the countryside, and set up the equipment. Run the test. Take the measurements and see who's right.
The costs? You may be able to rent some of this stuff, so you won't have to buy it. It shouldn't be terribly expensive.
The last part may be the most difficult. Getting an E-cat to test. That may mean buying one. Who would want to buy one of these things? Not me. Rossi wants 2k for each kilowatt. A 2.7 killowatt device would cost 5400 bucks. You would need to buy one and set the sucker up and so forth. The test could run in the thousands of dollars. Then you would have to have a way to judge who won the bet.
If enough people wanted to, they could set up the scenario and share the expense. The losers would end up paying for the test.
Let's say it would cost 10 grand to buy an E-cat and set it up. If you can get enough people to get in on the bet, you may be able to cover that cost by a factor of two. Then you would need even money on the bet.
Twenty grand may do it. Ten grand to buy the E-cat and set it up. Ten grand purse to pay the winners and make it a no lose if you win. The losers lose their ten grand.
